Wongso said she felt frequently pressured by guide prosecutor Shandy Handika, With all the media awareness impacting her mental wellbeing. An interview While using the movie's director Rob Sixsmith was Minimize shorter and perpetually forbidden due to dialogue turning "way too deep." The courtroom was referred to as a "football stadium", with audiences constantly cheering and exclaiming.
” which aims Again to inform the story of 1 of Indonesia’s most notorious and controversial murder cases.
Chicago lady Heather Mack was sentenced to a decade in jail in Indonesia for aiding inside the murder of her socialite mom in 2014. Will she now facial area further more time inside the U.S.?
Critically the movie was gained quite positively with publications like The Diplomat stating, "While the Tale polarized Indonesia, with supporters forming groups in favor of possibly Wongso or Salihin, enough time which includes ensued For the reason that conviction has permitted for any calmer and cooler assessment in the activities that transpired, something which the new Netflix documentary aims to attain."[14]
Hasibuan discovered no odour from the bottle which the espresso was transferred to; Furthermore, this was an example of tampering with proof.
This resulted in community speculation that Jessica Wongso was not the killer and was forcibly imprisoned.[21] The speculation later was countered by Edward "Eddy" Omar Sharif Hiariej, a professor at Faculty of Law of Gadjah Mada College and qualified witness at the demo of the situation, who reported that Jessica is clearly the murderer by including proof from 9 CCTV recordings and two expert witnesses.[22] He also included that due to the chance theory that he utilized together with I Created Gelgel to learn once the cyanide was put into the glass, he mentioned that every one the get more info witnesses had been in the same put and only observed Jessica near the coffee.
In spite of everyone’s ideal endeavours, and at the end of the Practically ninety-minute documentary, several challenges across the scenario continue on to hold within the air, and it truly is impossible to acquire get more info past the lack of an entire autopsy and so the questionable reason for Salihin’s Dying.
In the Netflix documentary, the prosecution workforce arrives throughout as stoic, defensive, and pleased with their initiatives to secure Wongso’s conviction, Even though they do not point out which the prosecutor’s Office environment requested, on 4 events, for more evidence to become submitted before it pressed in advance Along with the premeditated murder prices.
CCTV footage broadcast throughout the trial showed Ms Salihin arriving with one other Buddy and sitting down with Wongso, then having a sip of her espresso. In minutes Ms Salihin is witnessed slumping in her seat.
. This time, the new doc explores the 2016 murder of Mirna Salihin, who - aged just 27 - died immediately after drinking a Vietnamese iced coffee at an Indonesian procuring centre that was suspected for being laced with cyanide.
Wongso's prison record in Australia bundled crashing into an orphanage; officer John Torres observed she was after suicidal. Consequently, the perception arose that depressed people today like her tend read more to be more capable to murder. Indragiri refuted these promises, and Hidayat Bostam argued Those people are different difficulties.
Toxicologist Slamet Purnomo disclosed no autopsy was performed due to the Salihins only allowing a sampling with the belly; As a result, any alternate brings about of Loss of life cannot be examined. Djaja Surya Atmadja, a forensic pathologist, testified that 70 website minutes next her Demise, her abdomen tested negative for cyanide.
On account of the character with the criminal offense, the situation grew to become Indonesia's most famed and heavily publicised murder, Using the ruling even becoming televised and watched by countless Indonesians across the country.
The documentary casts doubt on important components in the prosecution’s narrative, elevating unpleasant queries: Did media bias prejudice the trial? Was the evidence much too weak for just a conviction? here Did general public belief force the judiciary?